[Jungfrau][DARK][CORRECT] Feat/fixed gain jungfrau

Adding gain mode condition to differentiate between fixed and dynamic run operation. using jungfrau settings in slow data.

Description

This MR is related to: https://git.xfel.eu/detectors/cal_db_interactive/-/merge_requests/76

Operating conditions

1. Adding new operating condition for Jungfrau: gain_mode

• A condition similar to AGIPD's gain_mode. 0 for adaptive gain and 1 for fixed gain.

Darks

2. New enums for the run setting. based on medium and low runs decide the gain mode (fixgain1 and fixgain2).
3. New badpixel enum + refactoring the available enums (WRONG_GAIN_VALUE).
4. The new bad pixel is identified by marking the pixels with wrong gain values. (e.g. g==1 in a high gain run)

Correct

5. Avoid correcting pixels with memory cell of 255. (A value indicating wrong cell image due to reciever and detector issues.)

Fixed gain_mode if medium and low runs are

The generated constants are only used for correcting runs with settings of fixgain1 or fixgain2.

How Has This Been Tested?

• Tested With runs from HED proposal p900227:
  • [Single]: 62, 63, 64
  • [Burst]: 65, 66, 67

Test results for detectors JNGFR01 and JNGFR02 for runs:

• [Single]: 96, 97, 98
• [Burst]: 100, 101, 102

are available at:

/gpfs/exfel/data/scratch/ahmedk/test/latest_jf_fixed_gain

• As there was an identified issue with the gains for module jungfrau_M039. A new runs are expected to do final tests. The tests results from the module _M039 was found good.

Relevant Documents (optional)

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

• Add gain mode to injected and retrieved constants.
• Use high thresholds for fixed gain.
• Update badpixels with wrong pixels in wrong gain.
• Avoid correcting images with cell value 255.
• Test with new runs and a different module other than _M039

Reviewers

@mramilli @danilevc @schmidtp @hammerd