{"id":34086,"iid":950,"description":" ## Description While testing a correction for the newly commissioned HIREX detector, the first run I picked didn't have trains and the correction failed ungracefully. I fixed this by erroring out more transparently and also added some info on the trains available in the whole run and each sequence before correction. ## How Has This Been Tested? ## Relevant Documents (optional) /gpfs/exfel/exp/SA1/202331/p900384/usr/Reports/r0060/SA1_XTD9_HIREX_correct_900384_r0060_240122_114656_909394.pdf ## Types of changes ## Checklist: ## Reviewers @schmidtp @kluyvert","title":"[Gotthard2][Correct] Show number of available trains and raise ValueError for runs with no trains","merge_params":{"force_remove_source_branch":"0"},"state":"merged","source_branch":"fix/gh2no_trains","target_branch":"master","source_branch_path":"/calibration/pycalibration/-/tree/fix/gh2no_trains","target_branch_path":"/calibration/pycalibration/-/tree/master","diff_head_sha":"b6d8826422f415ff737e6fdd5b159b6592563454","create_note_path":"/calibration/pycalibration/notes?target_id=34086&target_type=merge_request","preview_note_path":"/calibration/pycalibration/-/preview_markdown?target_id=950&target_type=MergeRequest","can_receive_suggestion":true,"create_issue_to_resolve_discussions_path":null,"new_blob_path":null,"current_user":{"can_create_note":false,"can_update":false,"can_create_confidential_note":false},"is_project_archived":false,"project_id":408}

[Gotthard2][Correct] Show number of available trains and raise ValueError for runs with no trains

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Relevant Documents (optional)

Types of changes

Checklist:

Reviewers

Merge request reports